Paper detail

Walking on the Ladder: 125 GeV Technidilaton, or Conformal Higgs -Dedicated to the late Professor Yoichiro Nambu-

The walking technicolor based on the ladder Schwinger-Dyson gap equation is studied, with the scale-invariant coupling being an idealization of the Caswell-Banks-Zaks infrared fixed point in the "anti-Veneziano limit", such that $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ with $N_C \cdot α(μ^2)=$ fixed and $N_F/N_C=$ fixed ($\gg 1$), of the $SU(N_C)$ gauge theory with massless $N_F$ flavors near criticality. We show that the 125 GeV Higgs can be naturally identified with the technidilaton (TD) predicted in the walking technicolor, a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone (NG) boson of the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the approximate scale symmetry. Ladder calculations yield the TD mass $M_ϕ$ from the trace anomaly as $M_ϕ^2 F_ϕ^2= -4 \langle θ_μ^μ\rangle = - \frac{β(α(μ^2))}{α(μ^2)}\, \langle G_{λν}^2(μ^2)\rangle \simeq N_C N_F\frac{16}{π^4} m_F^4$, independently of the renormalization point $μ$, where $m_F$ is the dynamical mass of the technifermion, and $F_ϕ={\cal O} (\sqrt{N_F N_C}\, m_F)$ the TD decay constant. It reads $M_ϕ^2\simeq (\frac{v_{\rm EW}}{2} \cdot \frac{5 v_{\rm EW}}{F_ϕ})^2 \cdot [\frac{8}{N_F}\frac{4}{N_C}]$, ($v_{\rm EW}=246$ GeV), which implies $F_ϕ\simeq 5 \,v_{\rm EW} $ for $M_ϕ\simeq 125\, {\rm GeV}\simeq \frac{1}{2} v_{\rm EW}$ in the one-family model ($N_C=4, N_F=8$), in good agreement with the current LHC Higgs data. The result reflects a generic scaling $ M_ϕ^2/v_{\rm EW}^2\sim M_ϕ^2/F_ϕ^2 \sim m_F^2 /F_ϕ^2 \sim 1/(N_F N_C) \rightarrow 0 $ as a vanishing trace anomaly, namely the TD has a mass vanishing in the anti-Veneziano limit, similarly to $η^\prime$ meson as a pseudo-NG boson of the ordinary QCD with vanishing $U(1)_A$ anomaly in the Veneziano limit ($N_F/N_C \ll 1$).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.