Paper detail

Volume Approximation of Strongly ${\mathbb C}$-Convex Domains by Random Polyhedra

Polyhedral-type approximations of convex-like domains in $\mathbb{C}^d$ have been considered recently by the second author. In particular, the decay rate of the error in optimal volume approximation as a function of the number of facets has been obtained. In this article, we take these studies further by investigating polyhedra constructed using random points (Poisson or binomial process) on the boundary of a strongly $\mathbb{C}$-convex domain. We determine the rate of error in volume approximation of the domain by random polyhedra, and conjecture the precise value of the minimal limiting constant. Analogous to the real case, the exponent appearing in the error rate of random volume approximation coincides with that of optimal volume approximation, and can be interpreted in terms of the Hausdorff dimension of a naturally-occurring metric space. Moreover, the limiting constant is conjectured to depend on the Möbius-Fefferman measure, which is a complex analogue of the Blaschke surface area measure. Finally, we also prove $L^1$-convergence, variance bounds, and normal approximation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.