Paper detail

Volume and lattice points counting for the cyclopermutohedron

The face lattice of the permutohedron realizes the combinatorics of linearly ordered partitions of the set $[n]=\{1,...,n\}$. Similarly, the cyclopermutohedron is a virtual polytope that realizes the combinatorics of cyclically ordered partitions of $[n]$. It is known that the volume of the standard permutohedron equals the number of trees with $n$ labeled vertices multiplied by $\sqrt{n}$. The number of integer points of the standard permutohedron equals the number of forests on $n$ labeled vertices. In the paper we prove that the volume of the cyclopermutohedron also equals some weighted number of forests, which eventually reduces to zero. We also derive a combinatorial formula for the number of integer points in the cyclopermutohedron. Another object of the paper is the configuration space of a polygonal linkage $L$. It has a cell decomposition $\mathcal{K}(L)$ related to the face lattice of cyclopermutohedron. Using this relationship, we introduce and compute the volume $Vol(\mathcal{K}(L))$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.