Paper detail

Violation of ensemble equivalence in the antiferromagnetic mean-field XY model

It is well known that long-range interactions pose serious problems for the formulation of statistical mechanics. We show in this paper that ensemble equivalence is violated in a simple mean-field model of N fully coupled classical rotators with repulsive interaction (antiferromagnetic XY model). While in the canonical ensemble the rotators are randomly dispersed over all angles, in the microcanonical ensemble a bi-cluster of rotators separated by angle $π$, forms in the low energy limit. We attribute this behavior to the extreme degeneracy of the ground state: only one harmonic mode is present, together with N-1 zero modes. We obtain empirically an analytical formula for the probability density function for the angle made by the rotator, which compares extremely well with numerical data and should become exact in the zero energy limit. At low energy, in the presence of the bi-cluster, an extensive amount of energy is located in the single harmonic mode, with the result that the energy temperature relation is modified. Although still linear, $T = αU$, it has the slope $α\approx 1.3$, instead of the canonical value $α=2$.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.