Paper detail

Vertical-likelihood Monte Carlo

In this review, we address the use of Monte Carlo methods for approximating definite integrals of the form $Z = \int L(x) d P(x)$, where $L$ is a target function (often a likelihood) and $P$ a finite measure. We present vertical-likelihood Monte Carlo, which is an approach for designing the importance function $g(x)$ used in importance sampling. Our approach exploits a duality between two random variables: the random draw $X \sim g$, and the corresponding random likelihood ordinate $Y\equiv L(X)$ of the draw. It is natural to specify $g(x)$ and ask: what is the the implied distribution of $Y$? In this paper, we take up the opposite question: what should the distribution of $Y$ be so that the implied importance function $g(x)$ is good for approximating $Z$? Our answer turns out to unite seven seemingly disparate classes of algorithms under the vertical-likelihood perspective: importance sampling, slice sampling, simulated annealing/tempering, the harmonic-mean estimator, the vertical-density sampler, nested sampling, and energy-level sampling (a suite of related methods from statistical physics). In particular, we give an alterate presentation of nested sampling, paying special attention to the connection between this method and the vertical-likelihood perspective articulated here. As an alternative to nested sampling, we describe an MCMC method based on re-weighted slice sampling. This method's convergence properties are studied, and two examples demonstrate the promise of the overall approach.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.