Paper detail

Variations on a theme of Cline and Donkin

Let $N$ be a normal subgroup of a group $G$. An $N$-module $Q$ is $G$-stable provided that $Q$ is equivalent to the twist $Q^g$ of $Q$ by $g$, for every $g\in G$. If the action of $N$ on $Q$ extends to an action of $G$ on $Q$, $Q$ is obviously $G$-stable, but the converse need not hold. A famous conjecture in the modular representation theory of reductive algebraic groups $G$ asserts that the (obviously $G$-stable) projective indecomposable modules (PIMs) $Q$ for the Frobenius kernels of $G$ have a $G$-module structure. It is sometimes just as useful (for a general module $Q$) to know that a finite direct sum $Q^{\oplus n}$ of $Q$ has a compatible $G$-module structure. In this paper, this property is called numerical stability. In recent work (arXiv:0909.5207v2), the authors established numerical stability in the special case of PIMs. We provide in this paper a more general context for that result, working in the context of group schemes and a suitable version of $G$-stability, called strong $G$-stability. Among our results here is the presentation of a homological obstruction to the existence of a $G$-module structure, on strongly $G$-stable modules, and a tensor product approach to killing the obstruction.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.