Paper detail

Variational Autoencoding of PDE Inverse Problems

Specifying a governing physical model in the presence of missing physics and recovering its parameters are two intertwined and fundamental problems in science. Modern machine learning allows one to circumvent these, via emulators and surrogates, but in doing so disregards prior knowledge and physical laws that are especially important for small data regimes, interpretability, and decision making. In this work we fold the mechanistic model into a flexible data-driven surrogate to arrive at a physically structured decoder network. This provides accelerated inference for the Bayesian inverse problem, and can act as a drop-in regulariser that encodes a-priori physical information. We employ the variational form of the PDE problem and introduce stochastic local approximations as a form of model based data augmentation. We demonstrate both the accuracy and increased computational efficiency of the framework on real world settings and structured spatial processes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.