Paper detail

Variation in the luminosity of Kerr quasars due to extra dimension in brane Randall-Sundrum model

We propose an alternative theoretical approach showing how the existence of an extra dimension in Randall-Sundrum model can estimate the correction in the horizon of Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes, and consequently its measurability in terms of the variation of quasar luminosity, which can be caused by a imprint of an extra dimension endowing the geometry of a brane-world scenario in an AdS5 bulk. The rotation effects cause a more prominent correction in Kerr horizon radius than in Schwarzschild (static black hole) radius, via brane-world effects, and the consequent bigger variation in the luminosity in Kerr black holes quasars. This paper is intended to investigate the variation of luminosity due to accretion of gas in Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes (BHs) in the center of quasars, besides also investigating the variation of luminosity in supermassive BHs by brane-world effects, using Randall-Sundrum model.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.