Paper detail

Variable Importance in Generalized Linear Models -- A Unifying View Using Shapley Values

Variable importance in regression analyses is of considerable interest in a variety of fields. There is no unique method for assessing variable importance. However, a substantial share of the available literature employs Shapley values, either explicitly or implicitly, to decompose a suitable goodness-of-fit measure, in the linear regression model typically the classical $R^2$. Beyond linear regression, there is no generally accepted goodness-of-fit measure, only a variety of pseudo-$R^2$s. We formulate and discuss the desirable properties of goodness-of-fit measures that enable Shapley values to be interpreted in terms of relative, and even absolute, importance. We suggest to use a pseudo-$R^2$ based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence, the Kullback-Leibler $R^2$, which has a convenient form for generalized linear models and permits to unify and extend previous work on variable importance for linear and nonlinear models. Several examples are presented, using data from public health and insurance.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.