Paper detail

Variable Binding for Sparse Distributed Representations: Theory and Applications

Symbolic reasoning and neural networks are often considered incompatible approaches. Connectionist models known as Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) can potentially bridge this gap. However, classical VSAs and neural networks are still considered incompatible. VSAs encode symbols by dense pseudo-random vectors, where information is distributed throughout the entire neuron population. Neural networks encode features locally, often forming sparse vectors of neural activation. Following Rachkovskij (2001); Laiho et al. (2015), we explore symbolic reasoning with sparse distributed representations. The core operations in VSAs are dyadic operations between vectors to express variable binding and the representation of sets. Thus, algebraic manipulations enable VSAs to represent and process data structures in a vector space of fixed dimensionality. Using techniques from compressed sensing, we first show that variable binding between dense vectors in VSAs is mathematically equivalent to tensor product binding between sparse vectors, an operation which increases dimensionality. This result implies that dimensionality-preserving binding for general sparse vectors must include a reduction of the tensor matrix into a single sparse vector. Two options for sparsity-preserving variable binding are investigated. One binding method for general sparse vectors extends earlier proposals to reduce the tensor product into a vector, such as circular convolution. The other method is only defined for sparse block-codes, block-wise circular convolution. Our experiments reveal that variable binding for block-codes has ideal properties, whereas binding for general sparse vectors also works, but is lossy, similar to previous proposals. We demonstrate a VSA with sparse block-codes in example applications, cognitive reasoning and classification, and discuss its relevance for neuroscience and neural networks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.