Paper detail

$\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ in 331 Models

Motivated by the recent findings that the ratio $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ in the Standard Model (SM) appears to be significantly below the data we investigate whether the necessary enhancement of this ratio can be obtained in 331 models, in which new physics (NP) contributions to $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ and other flavour observables are dominated by tree-level exchanges of a $Z^\prime$. NP contributions to $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ in these models are governed by the electroweak operator $Q_8$ for which the hadronic matrix element is rather well known so that our analysis of NP contributions is subject to much smaller uncertainties than within the SM. We consider seven 331 models selected in our earlier analysis on the basis of electroweak precision data. Imposing the constraints from $ΔF=2$ transitions we find that only three of these models can provide a significant positive shift in $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ up to $6\times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{Z^\prime}=3$ TeV. Two of them allow simultaneously a supression of ${\cal B}(B_{s}\to μ^+μ^-)$ by $20\%$, bringing the theory closer to the data without any significant impact on the Wilson coefficient $C_9$. The third one provides also the shift $ΔC_9=-0.6$, softening the anomalies in $B\to K^*μ^+μ^-$, without any significant impact on $B_{s}\to μ^+μ^-$. NP effects in rare $K$ decays and in $B\to K(K^*)ν\barν$ turn out to be small. The flavour structure of 331 models implies that even for $M_{Z^\prime}=30$ Tev a shift of $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ up to $8\times 10^{-4}$ and a significant shift in $\varepsilon_K$ can be obtained, while the effects in other flavour observables are small.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.