Paper detail

Value of structural health information in partially observable stochastic environments

Efficient integration of uncertain observations with decision-making optimization is key for prescribing informed intervention actions, able to preserve structural safety of deteriorating engineering systems. To this end, it is necessary that scheduling of inspection and monitoring strategies be objectively performed on the basis of their expected value-based gains that, among others, reflect quantitative metrics such as the Value of Information (VoI) and the Value of Structural Health Monitoring (VoSHM). In this work, we introduce and study the theoretical and computational foundations of the above metrics within the context of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), thus alluding to a broad class of decision-making problems of partially observable stochastic deteriorating environments that can be modeled as POMDPs. Step-wise and life-cycle VoI and VoSHM definitions are devised and their bounds are analyzed as per the properties stemming from the Bellman equation and the resulting optimal value function. It is shown that a POMDP policy inherently leverages the notion of VoI to guide observational actions in an optimal way at every decision step, and that the permanent or intermittent information provided by SHM or inspection visits, respectively, can only improve the cost of this policy in the long-term, something that is not necessarily true under locally optimal policies, typically adopted in decision-making of structures and infrastructure. POMDP solutions are derived based on point-based value iteration methods, and the various definitions are quantified in stationary and non-stationary deteriorating environments, with both infinite and finite planning horizons, featuring single- or multi-component engineering systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.