Paper detail

Validity of Harris criterion for two-dimensional quantum spin systems with quenched disorder

Inspired by the recent results regarding whether the Harris criterion is valid for quantum spin systems, we have simulated a two-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice with a specific kind of quenched disorder using the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations. In particular, the considered quenched disorder has a tunable parameter $0\le p \le 1$ which can be considered as a measure of randomness. Interestingly, when the magnitude of $p$ increases from 0 to 0.9, at the associated quantum phase transitions the numerical value of the correlation length exponent $ν$ grows from a number compatible with the $O(3)$ result 0.7112(5) to a number slightly greater than 1. In other words, by varying $p$, $ν$ can reach an outcome between 0.7112(5) and 1 (or greater). Furthermore, among the studied values of $p$, all the associated $ν$ violate the Harris criterion except the one corresponding to $p=0.9$. Considering the form of the employed disorder here, the above described scenario should remain true for other randomness if it is based on the similar idea as the one used in this study. This is indeed confirmed by our preliminary results stemming from investigating another disorder distribution.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.