Paper detail

Validity of Anderson's theorem for s-wave superconductors

We investigate validity of Anderson's theorem (AT) for disordered s-wave superconductors in a negative U Hubbard model with random on-site energies, $ε_{i}$. The superconducting critical temperature, $T_{c}$, is calculated in the coherent potential approximation (CPA) as a function of impurity concentration, $c$, the random potentials for different band filling. In contradiction to Anderson's theorem, we found that $T_{c}$ is dramatically sensitive with respect to $c$ and $ε_{i}$. Our results shows that for low impurity concentrations and weak on-site energies, $ε_{i}$, the AT is valid, while in the strong scattering limit even for low impurity concentration, $T_{c}$ is very small with respect to the clean system and by increasing $c$ it is completely suppressed, hence AT is violated in this regime.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.