Paper detail

Validation of GEANT4 Monte Carlo Models with a Highly Granular Scintillator-Steel Hadron Calorimeter

Calorimeters with a high granularity are a fundamental requirement of the Particle Flow paradigm. This paper focuses on the prototype of a hadron calorimeter with analog readout, consisting of thirty-eight scintillator layers alternating with steel absorber planes. The scintillator plates are finely segmented into tiles individually read out via Silicon Photomultipliers. The presented results are based on data collected with pion beams in the energy range from 8GeV to 100GeV. The fine segmentation of the sensitive layers and the high sampling frequency allow for an excellent reconstruction of the spatial development of hadronic showers. A comparison between data and Monte Carlo simulations is presented, concerning both the longitudinal and lateral development of hadronic showers and the global response of the calorimeter. The performance of several GEANT4 physics lists with respect to these observables is evaluated.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
C. AdloffJ. BlahaJ. -J. BlaisingC. DrancourtA. EspargilièreR. GaglioneN. GeffroyY. KaryotakisJ. PrastG. VoutersK. FrancisJ. RepondJ. SchlerethJ. SmithL. XiaE. BaldolemarJ. LiS. T. ParkM. SosebeeA. P. WhiteJ. YuT. BuanesG. EigenY. MikamiN. K. WatsonG. MavromanolakisM. A. ThomsonD. R. WardW. YanD. BenchekrounA. HoummadaY. KhoulakiJ. ApostolakisA. DottiG. FolgerV. IvantchenkoV. UzhinskiyM. BenyamnaC. CârloganuF. FehrP. GayS. ManenL. RoyerG. C. BlazeyA. DyshkantJ. G. R. LimaV. ZutshiJ. -Y. HostachyL. MorinU. CornettD. DavidG. FalleyK. GadowP. GöttlicherC. GünterB. HermbergS. KarstensenF. KrivanA. -I. Lucaci-TimoceS. LuB. LutzS. MorozovV. MorgunovM. ReineckeF. SefkowP. SmirnovM. TerwortA. Vargas-TrevinoN. FeegeE. GaruttiI. MarchesinikM. RamilliP. EckertT. HarionA. KaplanH. -Ch. Schultz-CoulonW. ShenR. StamenB. BilkiE. NorbeckY. OnelG. W. WilsonK. KawagoeP. D. DaunceyA. -M. MagnanV. BartschM. WingF. SalvatoreE. Calvo AlamilloM. -C. FouzJ. Puerta-PelayoB. BobchenkoM. ChadeevaM. DanilovA. EpifantsevO. MarkinR. MizukE. NovikovV. PopovV. RusinovE. TarkovskyN. KirikovaV. KozlovY. SolovievP. BuzhanA. IlyinV. KantserovV. KaplinA. KarakashE. PopovaV. TikhomirovC. KieslingK. SeidelF. SimonC. SoldnerM. SzalayM. TesarL. WeusteM. S. AmjadJ. BonisS. CallierS. Conforti di LorenzoP. CornebisePh. DoubletF. DulucqJ. FleuryT. FrissonN. van der KolkH. LiG. Martin-ChassardF. RichardCh. de la TailleR. PöschlL. RauxJ. RouënéN. Seguin-MoreauM. AnduzeV. BoudryJ-C. BrientD. JeansP. Mora de FreitasG. MusatM. ReinhardM. RuanH. VideauB. BulanekJ. ZacekJ. CvachP. GallusM. HavranekM. JanataJ. KvasnickaD. LednickyM. MarcisovskyI. PolakJ. PopuleL. TomasekM. TomasekP. RuzickaP. SichoJ. SmolikV. VrbaJ. ZalesakB. BelhormaH. GhazlaneT. TakeshitaS. UozumiM. GötzeO. HartbrichJ. SauerS. WeberC. Zeitnitz
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

C. AdloffJ. BlahaJ. -J. BlaisingC. DrancourtA. EspargilièreR. GaglioneN. GeffroyY. KaryotakisJ. PrastG. VoutersK. FrancisJ. RepondJ. SchlerethJ. SmithL. XiaE. BaldolemarJ. LiS. T. ParkM. SosebeeA. P. WhiteJ. YuT. BuanesG. EigenY. MikamiN. K. WatsonG. MavromanolakisM. A. ThomsonD. R. WardW. YanD. BenchekrounA. HoummadaY. KhoulakiJ. ApostolakisA. DottiG. FolgerV. IvantchenkoV. UzhinskiyM. BenyamnaC. CârloganuF. FehrP. GayS. ManenL. RoyerG. C. BlazeyA. DyshkantJ. G. R. LimaV. ZutshiJ. -Y. HostachyL. MorinU. CornettD. DavidG. FalleyK. GadowP. GöttlicherC. GünterB. HermbergS. KarstensenF. KrivanA. -I. Lucaci-TimoceS. LuB. LutzS. MorozovV. MorgunovM. ReineckeF. SefkowP. SmirnovM. TerwortA. Vargas-TrevinoN. FeegeE. GaruttiI. MarchesinikM. RamilliP. EckertT. HarionA. KaplanH. -Ch. Schultz-CoulonW. ShenR. StamenB. BilkiE. NorbeckY. OnelG. W. WilsonK. KawagoeP. D. DaunceyA. -M. MagnanV. BartschM. WingF. SalvatoreE. Calvo AlamilloM. -C. FouzJ. Puerta-PelayoB. BobchenkoM. ChadeevaM. DanilovA. EpifantsevO. MarkinR. MizukE. NovikovV. PopovV. RusinovE. TarkovskyN. KirikovaV. KozlovY. SolovievP. BuzhanA. IlyinV. KantserovV. KaplinA. KarakashE. PopovaV. TikhomirovC. KieslingK. SeidelF. SimonC. SoldnerM. SzalayM. TesarL. WeusteM. S. AmjadJ. BonisS. CallierS. Conforti di LorenzoP. CornebisePh. DoubletF. DulucqJ. FleuryT. FrissonN. van der KolkH. LiG. Martin-ChassardF. RichardCh. de la TailleR. PöschlL. RauxJ. RouënéN. Seguin-MoreauM. AnduzeV. BoudryJ-C. BrientD. JeansP. Mora de FreitasG. MusatM. ReinhardM. RuanH. VideauB. BulanekJ. ZacekJ. CvachP. GallusM. HavranekM. JanataJ. KvasnickaD. LednickyM. MarcisovskyI. PolakJ. PopuleL. TomasekM. TomasekP. RuzickaP. SichoJ. SmolikV. VrbaJ. ZalesakB. BelhormaH. GhazlaneT. TakeshitaS. UozumiM. GötzeO. HartbrichJ. SauerS. WeberC. Zeitnitz

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.