Paper detail

Using thermo-optical nonlinearity to robustly separate absorption and radiation losses in nanophotonic resonators

Low-loss nanophotonic resonators have been widely used in fundamental science and applications thanks to their ability to concentrate optical energy. Key for resonator engineering, the total intrinsic loss is easily determined by spectroscopy, however, quantitatively separating absorption and radiative losses is challenging. While the concentrated heat generated by absorption within the small mode volume results in generally unwanted thermo-optical effects, they can provide a way for quantifying absorption. Here, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a technique for separating the loss mechanisms with high confidence using only linear spectroscopic measurements. We use the optically measured resonator thermal time constant to experimentally connect the easily-calculable heat capacity to the thermal impedance, needed to calculate the absorbed power from the temperature change. We report the absorption, radiation, and coupling losses for ten whispering-gallery modes of three different radial orders on a Si microdisk. Similar absorptive loss rates are found for all the modes, despite order-of-magnitude differences in the total dissipation rate due to widely differing radiation losses. Measuring radiation losses of many modes enables distinguishing the two major components of radiation loss originating from scattering and leakage. The all-optical characterization technique is applicable to any nanophotonic resonators subject to thermo-optical effects.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.