Paper detail

Using the SAL technique for spatial verification of cloud processes: A sensitivity analysis

The feature based spatial verification method SAL is applied to cloud data, i.e. two-dimensional spatial fields of total cloud cover and spectral radiance. Model output is obtained from the COSMO-DE forward operator SynSat and compared to SEVIRI satellite data. The aim of this study is twofold. First, to assess the applicability of SAL to this kind of data, and second, to analyze the role of external object identification algorithms (OIA) and the effects of observational uncertainties on the resulting scores. As a feature based method, SAL requires external OIA. A comparison of three different algorithms shows that the threshold level, which is a fundamental part of all studied algorithms, induces high sensitivity and unstable behavior of object dependent SAL scores (i.e. even very small changes in parameter values can lead to large changes in the resulting scores). An in-depth statistical analysis reveals significant effects on distributional quantities commonly used in the interpretation of SAL, e.g. median and interquartile distance. Two sensitivity indicators based on the univariate cumulative distribution functions are derived. They allow to asses the sensitivity of the SAL scores to threshold level changes without computationally expensive iterative calculations of SAL for various thresholds. The mathematical structure of these indicators connects the sensitivity of the SAL scores to parameter changes with the effect of observational uncertainties. Finally, the discriminating power of SAL is studied. It is shown, that - for large-scale cloud data - changes in the parameters may have larger effects on the object dependent SAL scores (i.e. the S and L2 scores) than a complete loss of temporal collocation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.