Paper detail

Using reduced-precision arithmetic in the adjoint model of MITgcm

In recent years, it has been convincingly shown that weather forecasting models can be run in single-precision arithmetic. Several models or components thereof have been tested with even lower precision than this. This previous work has largely focused on the main nonlinear `forward' model. A nonlinear model (in weather forecasting or otherwise) can have corresponding tangent linear and adjoint models, which are used in 4D variational data assimilation. The linearised models are plausibly far more sensitive to reductions in numerical precision since unbounded error growth can occur with no possibility of nonlinear saturation. In this paper, we present a geophysical experiment that makes use of an adjoint model to calculate sensitivities and perform optimisation. Using software emulation, we investigate the effect of degrading the numerical precision of the adjoint model. We find that reasonable results are obtained with as few as 10 significand bits, equal to the significand precision in the IEEE half-precision standard.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.