Paper detail

Using Expander Graphs to test whether samples are i.i.d

The purpose of this note is to point out that the theory of expander graphs leads to an interesting test whether $n$ real numbers $x_1, \dots, x_n$ could be $n$ independent samples of a random variable. To any distinct, real numbers $x_1, \dots, x_n$, we associate a 4-regular graph $G$ as follows: using $π$ to denote the permutation ordering the elements, $x_{π(1)} < x_{π(2)} < \dots < x_{π(n)}$, we build a graph on $\left\{1, \dots, n\right\}$ by connecting $i$ and $i+1$ (cyclically) and $π(i)$ and $π(i+1)$ (cyclically). If the numbers are i.i.d. samples, then a result of Friedman implies that $G$ is close to Ramanujan. This suggests a test for whether these numbers are i.i.d: compute the second largest (in absolute value) eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix. The larger $λ- 2\sqrt{3}$, the less likely it is for the numbers to be i.i.d. We explain why this is a reasonable test and give many examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.