Paper detail

Using a Birth-Death Process to Account for Reporting Errors in Longitudinal Self-reported Counts of Behavior

We analyze longitudinal self-reported counts of sexual partners from youth living with HIV. In self-reported survey data, subjects recall counts of events or behaviors such as the number of sexual partners or the number of drug uses in the past three months. Subjects with small counts may report the exact number, whereas subjects with large counts may have difficulty recalling the exact number. Thus, self-reported counts are noisy, and mis-reporting induces errors in the count variable. As a naive method for analyzing self-reported counts, the Poisson random effects model treats the observed counts as true counts and reporting errors in the outcome variable are ignored. Inferences are therefore based on incorrect information and may lead to conclusions unsupported by the data. We describe a Bayesian model for analyzing longitudinal self-reported count data that formally accounts for reporting error. We model reported counts conditional on underlying true counts using a linear birth-death process and use a Poisson random effects model to model the underlying true counts. A regression version of our model can identify characteristics of subjects with greater or lesser reporting error. We demonstrate several approaches to prior specification.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.