Paper detail

Upper Limit on the Size of Galactic Halo via Hamiltonian Approach

Using the approach of autonomous Hamiltonian dynamical system, we attempt to estimate the as yet unknown upper limit on the size of the galactic halo surrounding galaxies (lenses). The key to determine the size of the halo is to determine the maximum radius up to which stable material circular orbits are admissible. We shall illustrate the approach by considering a solution of the Weyl gravity containing a halo parameter $γ$. The upper limit for several observed lenses are calculated for a typical value of $gamma$ for definiteness, with and without the cosmological constant $Λ$. These lenses (all having Einstein radius $R_{\text{E}}\approx 10^{23}$ cm) consistently yield an upper limit $R_{\text{max}}^{\text{stable}}$($\simeq 4.25\times 10^{27}$ cm) inside the de Sitter radius only when $γ$ is \textit{negative}, while a positive $γ$ yields $R_{\text{max}}^{\text{% stable}}$ always exceeding the de Sitter radius.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.