Paper detail

Upper Bounds for the Number of Number Fields with Alternating Galois Group

We study the number $N(n, A_n, X)$ of number fields of degree $n$ whose Galois closure has Galois group $A_n$ and whose discriminant is bounded by $X$. By a conjecture of Malle, we expect that $N(n, A_n, X) \sim C_n X^{1/2} (\log X)^{b_n}$, for constants $b_n$ and $C_n$. For $5 < n < 84394$, the best known upper bound is $N(n, A_n, X) \ll X^{\frac{n + 2}{4}}$; this bound follows from Schmidt's Theorem, which implies there are $\ll X^{\frac{n + 2}{4}}$ number fields of degree $n$. (For $n > 84393$, there are better bounds due to Ellenberg and Venkatesh.) We show, using the important work of Pila on counting integral points on curves, that $N(n, A_n, X) \ll X^{\frac{n^2 - 2}{4(n - 1)}+ε}$, thereby improving the best previous exponent by approximately 1/4 for $5 < n < 84394$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.