Paper detail

Upper bound on the second derivative of the quenched pressure in spin-glass models: weak Griffiths second inequality

The Griffiths first and second inequalities have played an important role in the analysis of ferromagnetic models. In spin-glass models, although the counterpart of the Griffiths first inequality has been obtained, the counterpart of the Griffiths second inequality has not been established. In this study, we generalize the method in the previous work [J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 074711 (2007)] to the case with multi variables for both symmetric and non-symmetric distributions of the interactions, and derive some correlation inequalities for spin-glass models. Furthermore, by combining the acquired equalities in symmetric distributions, we show that there is a non-trivial positive upper bound on the second derivative of the quenched pressure with respect to the strength of the randomness, which is a weak result of the counterpart of the Griffiths second inequality in spin-glass models for general symmetric distributions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.