Updated Analysis of Some Two-Body Charmless B Decays

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Abstract

New data from the BaBar, Belle, and CLEO Collaborations on B decays to two-body charmless final states are analyzed, with the following consequences: (1) The penguin amplitude which dominates the decay B+→π+K∗0B^+ \to π^+ K^{*0} has a magnitude similar to that dominating B+→π+K0B^+ \to π^+ K^0. (2) The decay B+→π+ηB^+ \to π^+ η, a good candidate for observing direct CP violation, should be detectable at present levels of sensitivity. (3) The decays B+→η′K+B^+ \to η' K^+ and B+→ηK∗+B^+ \to ηK^{*+} are sufficiently similar in rate to the corresponding decays B0→η′K0B^0 \to η' K^0 and B0→ηK∗0B^0 \to ηK^{*0}, respectively, that one cannot yet infer the need for ``tree'' amplitudes t′t' contributing to the B+B^+ but not the B0B^0 decays. Statistical requirements for observing this and other examples of tree-penguin interference are given. (4) Whereas the B+→η′K+B^+ \to η' K^+ and B0→η′K0B^0 \to η' K^0 rates cannot be accounted for by the penguin amplitude p′p' alone but require an additional flavor-singlet penguin contribution s′s', no such flavor-singlet penguin contribution is yet called for in the decays B+→ηK∗+B^+ \to ηK^{*+} or B0→ηK∗0B^0 \to ηK^{*0}. Predictions for the rates for B+→η′K∗+B^+ \to η' K^{*+} and B0→η′K∗0B^0 \to η' K^{*0} are given which would allow one to gauge the importance of these flavor-singlet penguin amplitudes.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.