Paper detail

Unusual Magnetic Response of an $S = 1$ Antiferromagetic Linear-Chain Material

An $S=1$ antiferromagnetic polymeric chain, [Ni(HF$_2$)(3-Clpy)$_4$]BF$_4$ (py = pyridine), has previously been identified to have intrachain, nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic interaction strength $J/k_{\mathrm{B}} = 4.86$ K and single-ion anisotropy (zero-field splitting) $D/k_{\mathrm{B}} = 4.3$ K, so the ratio $D/J = 0.88$ places this system close to the $D/J \approx 1$ gapless critical point between the topologically distinct Haldane and Large-$D$ phases. The magnetization was studied over a range of temperatures, 50 mK $\leq T \leq 1$ K, and magnetic fields, $B \leq 10$ T, in an attempt to identify a critical field, $B_{\mathrm{c}}$, associated with the closing of the Haldane gap, and the present work places an upper bound of $B_{\mathrm{c}} \leq (35 \pm 10)$ mT. At higher fields, the observed magnetic response is qualitatively similar to the "excess" signal observed by other workers at 0.5 K and below 3 T. The high-field (up to 14.5 T), multi-frequency (nomially 200 GHz to 425 GHz) ESR spectra at 3 K reveal several broad features considered to be associated with the linear-chain sample.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.