Paper detail

Unsupervised dense random survival forests identify interpretable patient profiles with heterogeneous treatment benefit

Precision oncology aims to prescribe the optimal cancer treatment to the right patients, maximizing therapeutic benefits. However, identifying patient subgroups that may benefit more from experimental cancer treatments based on randomized clinical trials presents a significant analytical challenge. To address this, we introduce a novel unsupervised machine learning approach based on very dense random survival forests (up to 100,000 trees), equipped with a new splitting rule that explicitly targets treatment-effect heterogeneity. This method is robust, interpretable, and effectively identifies responsive subgroups. Extensive simulations confirm its ability to detect heterogeneous patient responses and distinguish between datasets with and without heterogeneity, while maintaining a stringent Type I error rate of 1%. We further validate its performance using Phase III randomized clinical trial datasets, demonstrating significant patient heterogeneity in treatment response based on baseline characteristics.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.