Paper detail

Unraveling the $0νββ$ Decay Mechanisms

We discuss the possibilities of distinguishing among different mechanisms of neutrinoless double beta decay arising in the effective field theory framework. Following the review and detailed investigation of the particular ways of discrimination, we conclude that the 32 different low-energy effective operators can be split into multiple groups that are in principle distinguishable from each other by measurements of the phase-space observables and by comparison of the decay rates obtained using different isotopes. This would require not only a substantial experimental precision but necessarily also a considerable improvement of the current theoretical knowledge of the underlying nuclear physics. Specifically, the limiting aspect in our approach turns out to be the currently unknown or uncertain values of low-energy constants. Besides the study adopting the effective field theory language we also look into several typical UV models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.