Paper detail

Universality and identity ordering in heteropolymer coil-globule transition

The coil-globule transition of an energy polydisperse chain, a model heteropolymer system where the number of monomer species is as large as the total number of monomers, is studied by means of computer simulations. In this study, we systematically explore the consequences of having different functional form and variance of the energy distribution on the coil-globule transition in general. In particular, considering Gaussian (G) and uniform (U) distributions, the effect of varying polydispersity index, $δ$, on the transition temperature $θ^\ast$, chain size, internal structure and spatial organization of monomers in the globule, and kinetics of the folding are addressed. It is found that the transition temperature of the model heteropolymer is lower than that of the homopolymer counterpart, and $θ^\ast$ increases with $δ$ (both G and U) and $θ^\ast({\rm U}) < θ^\ast({\rm G})$ consistently. The results of our study suggest that $θ^\ast$ is governed by the most probable value (rather than the width) of the pair-wise energy distribution. Interestingly, the nature of the collapse transition turns out to be universal, i.e., when scaled properly (irrespective of the functional form and variance) all the swelling curves fall on a master curve and it is well described by the same scaling form of the homopolymer counterpart. However, following quenching, the transition from coil to globule is relatively fast for heteropolymer (with no significant difference between G and U systems, and no significant $δ$ dependence within the considered range). On the other hand, internal organization in the collapsed state, quantified through mean contact probability, show distinct scaling regimes. Also we observe segregation of monomers based on their identities which is more pronounced in the case of uniform distribution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.