Paper detail

Universal scaling functions for bond percolation on planar random and square lattices with multiple percolating clusters

Percolation models with multiple percolating clusters have attracted much attention in recent years. Here we use Monte Carlo simulations to study bond percolation on $L_{1}\times L_{2}$ planar random lattices, duals of random lattices, and square lattices with free and periodic boundary conditions, in vertical and horizontal directions, respectively, and with various aspect ratio $L_{1}/L_{2}$. We calculate the probability for the appearance of $n$ percolating clusters, $W_{n},$ the percolating probabilities, $P$, the average fraction of lattice bonds (sites) in the percolating clusters, $<c^{b}>_{n}$ ($<c^{s}>_{n}$), and the probability distribution function for the fraction $c$ of lattice bonds (sites), in percolating clusters of subgraphs with $n$ percolating clusters, $f_{n}(c^{b})$ ($f_{n}(c^{s})$). Using a small number of nonuniversal metric factors, we find that $W_{n}$, $P$, $<c^{b}>_{n}$ ($<c^{s}>_{n}$), and $f_{n}(c^{b})$ ($f_{n}(c^{s})$) for random lattices, duals of random lattices, and square lattices have the same universal finite-size scaling functions. We also find that nonuniversal metric factors are independent of boundary conditions and aspect ratios.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.