Paper detail

Universal gaps for XOR games from estimates on tensor norm ratios

We define and study XOR games in the framework of general probabilistic theories, which encompasses all physical models whose predictive power obeys minimal requirements. The bias of an XOR game under local or global strategies is shown to be given by a certain injective or projective tensor norm, respectively. The intrinsic (i.e.\ model-independent) advantage of global over local strategies is thus connected to a universal function $r(n,m)$ called 'projective-injective ratio'. This is defined as the minimal constant $ρ$ such that $\|\cdot\|_{X\otimes_πY}\leqρ\,\|\cdot\|_{X\otimes_\varepsilon Y}$ holds for all Banach spaces of dimensions $\dim X=n$ and $\dim Y=m$, where $X\otimes_πY$ and $X \otimes_\varepsilon Y$ are the projective and injective tensor products. By requiring that $X=Y$, one obtains a symmetrised version of the above ratio, denoted by $r_s(n)$. We prove that $r(n,m)\geq 19/18$ for all $n,m\geq 2$, implying that injective and projective tensor products are never isometric. We then study the asymptotic behaviour of $r(n,m)$ and $r_s(n)$, showing that, up to log factors: $r_s(n)$ is of the order $\sqrt{n}$ (which is sharp); $r(n,n)$ is at least of the order $n^{1/6}$; and $r(n,m)$ grows at least as $\min\{n,m\}^{1/8}$. These results constitute our main contribution to the theory of tensor norms. In our proof, a crucial role is played by an '$\ell_1$/$\ell_2$/$\ell_{\infty}$ trichotomy theorem' based on ideas by Pisier, Rudelson, Szarek, and Tomczak-Jaegermann. The main operational consequence we draw is that there is a universal gap between local and global strategies in general XOR games, and that this grows as a power of the minimal local dimension. In the quantum case, we are able to determine this gap up to universal constants. As a corollary, we obtain an improved bound on the scaling of the maximal quantum data hiding efficiency against local measurements.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.