Paper detail

Universal density scaling of disorder-limited low-temperature conductivity in high-mobility two-dimensional systems

We theoretically consider the carrier density dependence of low-temperature electrical conductivity in high-quality and low-disorder two-dimensional (2D) `metallic' electronic systems such as 2D GaAs electron or hole quantum wells or gated graphene. Taking into account resistive scattering by Coulomb disorder arising from quenched random charged impurities in the environment, we show that the 2D conductivity σ(n) varies as σ~ n^{β(n)} as a function of the 2D carrier density n where the exponent β(n) is a smooth, but non-monotonic, function of density with possible nontrivial extrema. In particular, the density scaling exponent β(n) depends qualitatively on whether the Coulomb disorder arises primarily from remote or background charged impurities or short-range disorder, and can, in principle, be used to characterize the nature of the dominant background disorder. A specific important prediction of the theory is that for resistive scattering by remote charged impurities, the exponent βcan reach a value as large as 2.7 for k_F d ~ 1, where k_F ~\sqrt{n} is the 2D Fermi wave vector and d is the separation of the remote impurities from the 2D layer. Such an exponent β(>5/2) is surprising because unscreened Coulomb scattering by remote impurities gives a limiting theoretical scaling exponent of β= 5/2, and naively one would expect β(n) \le 5/2 for all densities since unscreened Coulomb scattering should nominally be the situation bounding the resistive scattering from above. We find numerically and show theoretically that the maximum value of α(β), the mobility (conductivity) exponent, for 2D semiconductor quantum wells is around 1.7 (2.7) for all values of d (and for both electrons and holes) with the maximum αoccurring around k_F d ~ 1. We discuss experimental scenarios for the verification of our theory.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.