Paper detail

Unitary thermodynamics from thermodynamic geometry II: Fit to a local density approximation

Strongly interacting Fermi gasses at low density possess universal thermodynamic properties which have recently seen very precise $PVT$ measurements by a group at MIT. This group determined local thermodynamic properties of a system of ultra cold $^6\mbox{Li}$ atoms tuned to Feshbach resonance. In this paper, I analyze the MIT data with a thermodynamic theory of unitary thermodynamics based on ideas from critical phenomena. This theory was introduced in the first paper of this sequence, and characterizes the scaled thermodynamics by the entropy per particle $z= S/N k_B$, and energy per particle $Y(z)$, in units of the Fermi energy. $Y(z)$ is in two segments, separated by a second-order phase transition at $z=z_c$: a "normal" segment for $z>z_c$, and a "superfluid" segment for $z<z_c$. For small $z$, the theory obeys a series $Y(z)=y_0+y_1 z^{α}+y_2 z^{2 α}+\cdots,$ where $α$ is a constant exponent, and $y_i$ ($i\ge 0$) are constant series coefficients. For large $z$, the theory obeys a perturbation of the ideal gas $Y(z)= \tilde{y}_0\,\mbox{exp}[2γz/3]+ \tilde{y}_1\,\mbox{exp}[(2γ/3-1)z]+ \tilde{y}_2\,\mbox{exp}[(2γ/3-2)z]+\cdots$ where $γ$ is a constant exponent, and $\tilde{y}_i$ ($i\ge 0$) are constant series coefficients. This limiting form for large $z$ differs from the series used in the first paper, and was necessary to fit the MIT data. I fit the MIT data by adjusting four free independent theory parameters: $(α,γ,\tilde{y}_0,\tilde{y}_1)$. This fit process was augmented by trap integration and comparison with earlier thermal data taken at Duke University. The overall match to both the data sets was good, and had $α=1.21(3)$, $γ=1.21(3)$, $z_c=0.69(2)$, scaled critical temperature $T_c/T_F=0.161(3)$, where $T_F$ is the Fermi temperature, and Bertsch parameter $ξ_B=0.368(5)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.