Paper detail

Unitarity and the three flavour neutrino mixing matrix

Unitarity is a fundamental property of any theory required to ensure we work in a theoretically consistent framework. In comparison with the quark sector, experimental tests of unitarity for the 3x3 neutrino mixing matrix are considerably weaker. It must be remembered that the vast majority of our information on the neutrino mixing angles originates from $\overlineν_e$ and $ν_μ$ disappearance experiments, with the assumption of unitarity being invoked to constrain the remaining elements. New physics can invalidate this assumption for the 3x3 subset and thus modify our precision measurements. We perform a reanalysis to see how global knowledge is altered when one refits oscillation results without assuming unitarity, and present $3 σ$ ranges for allowed $U_\text{PMNS}$ elements consistent with all observed phenomena. We calculate the bounds on the closure of the six neutrino unitarity triangles, with the closure of the $ν_e ν_μ$ triangle being constrained to be $\leq$ 0.03, while the remaining triangles are significantly less constrained to be $\leq$ 0.1 - 0.2. Similarly for the row and column normalization, we find their deviation from unity is constrained to be $\leq$ 0.2 - 0.4, for four out of six such normalisations, while for the $ν_μ$ and $ν_e$ row normalisation the deviations are constrained to be $\leq$ 0.07, all at the $3σ$ CL. We emphasise that there is significant room for new low energy physics, especially in the $ν_τ$ sector which very few current experiments constrain directly.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.