Paper detail

Uniqueness of weighted Sobolev spaces with weakly differentiable weights

We prove that weakly differentiable weights $w$ which, together with their reciprocals, satisfy certain local integrability conditions, admit a unique associated first-order $p$-Sobolev space, that is \[H^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^d,w\,\d x)=V^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^d,w\,\d x)=W^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^d,w\,\d x),\] where $d\in\N$ and $p\in [1,\infty)$. If $w$ admits a (weak) logarithmic gradient $\nabla w/w$ which is in $L^q_{\text{loc}}(w\,\d x;\R^d)$, $q=p/(p-1)$, we propose an alternative definition of the weighted $p$-Sobolev space based on an integration by parts formula involving $\nabla w/w$. We prove that weights of the form $\exp(-β|\cdot|^q-W-V)$ are $p$-admissible, in particular, satisfy a Poincaré inequality, where $β\in (0,\infty)$, $W$, $V$ are convex and bounded below such that $|\nabla W|$ satisfies a growth condition (depending on $β$ and $q$) and $V$ is bounded. We apply the uniqueness result to weights of this type. The associated nonlinear degenerate evolution equation is also discussed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.