Paper detail

Uniqueness of topological solutions of self-dual Chern-Simons equation with collapsing vortices

We consider the following Chern-Simons equation, \begin{equation} \label{0.1} Δu+\frac 1{\varepsilon^2} e^u(1-e^u)=4π\sum_{i=1}^N δ_{p_i^\varepsilon},\quad \text{in}\quad Ω, \end{equation} where $Ω$ is a 2-dimensional flat torus, $\varepsilon>0$ is a coupling parameter and $δ_p$ stands for the Dirac measure concentrated at $p$. In this paper, we proved that the topological solutions of \eqref{0.1} are uniquely determined by the location of their vortices provided the coupling parameter $\varepsilon$ is small and the collapsing velocity of vortices $p_i^\varepsilon$ is slow enough or fast enough comparing with $\varepsilon$. This extends the uniqueness results of Choe \cite{Choe2005} and Tarantello \cite{Tarantello2007}. Meanwhile, for any topological solution $ψ$ defined in $\mathbb R^2$ whose linearized operator is non-degenerate, we construct a sequence topological solutions $u_\varepsilon$ of \eqref{0.1} whose asymptotic limit is exactly $ψ$ after rescaling around $0$. A consequence is that non-uniqueness of topological solutions in $\mathbb R^2$ implies non-uniqueness of topological solutions on torus with collapsing vortices.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.