Paper detail

Uniform semi-Latin squares and their pairwise-variance aberrations

For integers $n>2$ and $k>0$, an $(n\times n)/k$ semi-Latin square is an $n\times n$ array of $k$-subsets (called blocks) of an $nk$-set (of treatments), such that each treatment occurs once in each row and once in each column of the array. A semi-Latin square is uniform if every pair of blocks, not in the same row or column, intersect in the same positive number of treatments. We show that when a uniform $(n\times n)/k$ semi-Latin square exists, the Schur optimal $(n\times n)/k$ semi-Latin squares are precisely the uniform ones. We then compare uniform semi-Latin squares using the criterion of pairwise-variance (PV) aberration, introduced by J.P. Morgan for affine resolvable designs, and determine the uniform $(n\times n)/k$ semi-Latin squares with minimum PV aberration when there exist $n-1$ mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLS) of order $n$. These do not exist when $n=6$, and the smallest uniform semi-Latin squares in this case have size $(6\times 6)/10$. We present a complete classification of the uniform $(6\times 6)/10$ semi-Latin squares, and display the one with least PV aberration. We give a construction producing a uniform $((n+1)\times (n+1))/((n-2)n)$ semi-Latin square when there exist $n-1$ MOLS of order $n$, and determine the PV aberration of such a uniform semi-Latin square. Finally, we describe how certain affine resolvable designs and balanced incomplete-block designs (BIBDs) can be constructed from uniform semi-Latin squares. From the uniform $(6\times 6)/10$ semi-Latin squares we classified, we obtain (up to block design isomorphism) exactly 16875 affine resolvable designs for 72 treatments in 36 blocks of size 12 and 8615 BIBDs for 36 treatments in 84 blocks of size 6. In particular, this shows that there are at least 16875 pairwise non-isomorphic orthogonal arrays $\mathrm{OA}(72,6,6,2)$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.