Paper detail

Uniform in bandwidth exact rates for a class of kernel estimators

Given an i.i.d sample $(Y_i,Z_i)$, taking values in $\RRR^{d&#39;}\times \RRR^d$, we consider a collection Nadarya-Watson kernel estimators of the conditional expectations $\EEE(<c_g(z),g(Y)>+d_g(z)\mid Z=z)$, where $z$ belongs to a compact set $H\subset \RRR^d$, $g$ a Borel function on $\RRR^{d&#39;}$ and $c_g(\cdot),d_g(\cdot)$ are continuous functions on $\RRR^d$. Given two bandwidth sequences $h_n<\wth_n$ fulfilling mild conditions, we obtain an exact and explicit almost sure limit bounds for the deviations of these estimators around their expectations, uniformly in $g\in\GG,\;z\in H$ and $h_n\le h\le \wth_n$ under mild conditions on the density $f_Z$, the class $\GG$, the kernel $K$ and the functions $c_g(\cdot),d_g(\cdot)$. We apply this result to prove that smoothed empirical likelihood can be used to build confidence intervals for conditional probabilities $\PPP(Y\in C\mid Z=z)$, that hold uniformly in $z\in H,\; C\in \CC,\; h\in [h_n,\wth_n]$. Here $\CC$ is a Vapnik-Chervonenkis class of sets.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.