Paper detail

Unexpected advantages of exploitation for target searches in complex networks

Exploitation universally emerges in various decision-making contexts, e.g., animals foraging, web surfing, the evolution of scientists' research topics, and our daily lives. Despite its ubiquity, exploitation, which refers to the behavior of revisiting previous experiences, has often been considered to delay the search process of finding a target. In this paper, we investigate how exploitation affects search performance by applying a non-Markovian random walk model, where a walker randomly revisits a previously visited node using long-term memory. We analytically study two broad forms of network structures, namely (i) clique-like networks and (ii) lollipop-like networks, and find that exploitation can significantly improve search performance in lollipop-like networks whereas it hinders target search in clique-like networks. Moreover, we numerically verify that exploitation can reduce the time needed to fully explore the underlying networks by using $550$ diverse real-world networks. Based on the analytic result, we define the lollipop-likeness of a network and observe a positive relationship between the advantage of exploitation and lollipop-likeness.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.