Paper detail

Undulating compression and multi-stage relaxation in a granular column consisting of dust particles or glass beads

For fundamentally characterizing the effect of hierarchical structure in granular matter, a set of compression-relaxation tests for dust particles and glass beads confined in a cylindrical cell was performed. Typical diameter of both grains is approximately 1~mm. However, dust particles are produced by binding tiny ($\sim 5$~{\textmu}m) glass beads. The granular columns were compressed with a piston until reaching a maximum load force of 20~N with a constant compression rate $v$ ($0.17 \leq v \leq 2000$~{\textmu}m~s$^{-1}$). After that, the piston was stopped and the relaxation process was quantified. From the experimental results, we found that the compression force $F$ nonlinearly increases with the increase of compression stroke $z$ depending on particles. Besides, periodic undulation and sudden force drops were observed on $F(z)$ in dust particles and glass beads, respectively. The relaxation process was characterized by an exponential decay of stress followed by a logarithmic dependence one in both kinds of particles. These experimental findings are the main point in this study. To understand the underlying physics governing the compression mechanics, we assumed empirical forms of $F(z)$; $F\propto z^α$ for dust particles and $F \propto \exp(z/z_G)$ for glass beads ($α=2.4$ and $z_G=70$~{\textmu}m). Then, we found that the growing manners of periodic undulation and force drops were identical to those of mean compression forces, i.e., power law in dust particles and exponential in glass beads. In addition, the undulation amplitude and wavelength decreased as $v$ increased in dust-particles compression. On the basis of experimental results and the difference between dust particles and glass beads, we also discuss the origin of undulation and the physical meaning of granular-compression models used in engineering fields.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.