Paper detail

Understanding two-photon double ionization of helium from the perspective of the characteristic time of dynamic transitions

By using the B-spline numerical method, we investigate a two-photon double-ionization (TPDI) process of helium in a high-frequency laser field with its frequency ranging from 1.6~a.u. to 3.0~a.u. and the pulse duration ranging from 75 to 160~attoseconds. We found that there exists a characteristic time $t_{c}$ for a TPDI process, such that the pattern of energy distribution of two ionized electrons presents a peak or two, depending respectively on whether the pulse duration is shorter or longer than $t_{c}$. Especially, as the pulse duration is larger than $t_c$, the TPDI spectrum shows a double-peak structure which is attributed to the fact that most of the electron-electron Coulomb interaction energy is acquired by single electron during their oscillation around the nucleus before the two electrons leave. Additionally, if the photon energy is less than the ionization energy of He$^{+}$, $t_{c}$ is not a fixed value, and it increases as the photon energy decreases; while if the energy of a photon is greater than the ionization energy of He$^{+}$, $t_{c}$ is fixed at about 105 attoseconds. We further found that, for a helium-like ion in its ground state, the characteristic time for the case of the photon energy larger than the ionization energy of the second electron has a key relation with the Coulomb interaction energy $\overline{V}_{12}$ between the two electrons, which can be expressed as $t_{c}\overline{V}_{12}=4.192$, a type of quantum mechanical uncertainty relation between time and energy. In addition, this relation can be attributed to the existence of a minimal evolution time from the ground state to a double ionization state with two electrons carrying different energies. These results may shed light on deeper understanding of many-electron quantum dynamical processes.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.