Paper detail

Understanding the symmetry energy using data from the ALADIN-2000 Collaboration taken at the GSI Large Neutron Detector

The present study deals with the extraction of the symmetry energy from heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies. Using the isospin quantum molecular dynamical (IQMD) model, the dependence of the sum of the charge number for fragments with $Z\ge2$ ($Z_\textrm{bound}$) on the multiplicity of neutrons ($M_n$) from the projectile spectator fragmentation of $^{124}$Sn and $^{124}$La at 600 MeV/nucleon is compared with the experimental results of the ALADIN-2000 Collaboration. The comparison suggest a soft symmetry energy. In addition, the sensitivities of the symmetry energy towards the $Z_\textrm{bound}$ dependence on proton multiplicity ($M_p$), neutron-to-proton single [$R(n/p)$] and double ratio [$R_D(n/p)$] are also examined. The $Z_\textrm{bound}$ dependence of $R(n/p)$ is found to be the most sensitive observable towards the symmetry energy. The ALADIN Collaboration should extend the results for $R(n/p)$ in the near future.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.