Paper detail

Understanding the Strength of the Selenium -- Graphene Interfaces

We present a comprehensive first-principles Density Functional Theory (DFT) analyses of the interfacial strength and bonding mechanisms between crystalline and amorphous selenium(Se) with graphene(Gr), a promising duo for energy storage applications. Comparative interface analyses are presented on amorphous silicon(Si) with graphene and crystalline Se with aluminum(Al) substrate. The interface strength of monoclinic Se (0.43 J/m2) and amorphous Si with graphene (0.41 J/m2) is similar in magnitude. While both materials (c-Se, a-Si) are bonded loosely by van der Waals (vdW) forces over graphene, interfacial electron exchange is higher for a-Si/Gr. This is further elaborated by comparing potential energy step and charge transfer (delta q) across the graphene interfaces. The delta q for c-Se/Gr and a-Si/Gr are 0.3119 e-1 and 0.4266 e-1, respectively. However, the interface strength of c-Se on the 3D Al substrate is higher (0.99 J/m2), suggesting stronger adhesion. The amorphous Se with graphene has comparable interface strength (0.34 J/m2), but electron exchange in this system is slightly distinct from monoclinic Se. The electronic characteristics (density of states analysis) and bonding mechanisms are different for monoclinic and amorphous Se with graphene and they activate graphene via surface charge doping divergently. Our findings highlight the complex electrochemical phenomena in Se interfaced with graphene, which may profoundly differ from their 'free' counterparts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.