Researcher profile

David Mitlin

David Mitlin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Understanding the Strength of the Selenium -- Graphene Interfaces

We present a comprehensive first-principles Density Functional Theory (DFT) analyses of the interfacial strength and bonding mechanisms between crystalline and amorphous selenium(Se) with graphene(Gr), a promising duo for energy storage applications. Comparative interface analyses are presented on amorphous silicon(Si) with graphene and crystalline Se with aluminum(Al) substrate. The interface strength of monoclinic Se (0.43 J/m2) and amorphous Si with graphene (0.41 J/m2) is similar in magnitude. While both materials (c-Se, a-Si) are bonded loosely by van der Waals (vdW) forces over graphene, interfacial electron exchange is higher for a-Si/Gr. This is further elaborated by comparing potential energy step and charge transfer (delta q) across the graphene interfaces. The delta q for c-Se/Gr and a-Si/Gr are 0.3119 e-1 and 0.4266 e-1, respectively. However, the interface strength of c-Se on the 3D Al substrate is higher (0.99 J/m2), suggesting stronger adhesion. The amorphous Se with graphene has comparable interface strength (0.34 J/m2), but electron exchange in this system is slightly distinct from monoclinic Se. The electronic characteristics (density of states analysis) and bonding mechanisms are different for monoclinic and amorphous Se with graphene and they activate graphene via surface charge doping divergently. Our findings highlight the complex electrochemical phenomena in Se interfaced with graphene, which may profoundly differ from their 'free' counterparts.