Paper detail

Understanding the Great Recession Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Nyman and Ormerod (2017) show that the machine learning technique of random forests has the potential to give early warning of recessions. Applying the approach to a small set of financial variables and replicating as far as possible a genuine ex ante forecasting situation, over the period since 1990 the accuracy of the four-step ahead predictions is distinctly superior to those actually made by the professional forecasters. Here we extend the analysis by examining the contributions made to the Great Recession of the late 2000s by each of the explanatory variables. We disaggregate private sector debt into its household and non-financial corporate components. We find that both household and non-financial corporate debt were key determinants of the Great Recession. We find a considerable degree of non-linearity in the explanatory models. In contrast, the public sector debt to GDP ratio appears to have made very little contribution. It did rise sharply during the Great Recession, but this was as a consequence of the sharp fall in economic activity rather than it being a cause. We obtain similar results for both the United States and the United Kingdom.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.