Paper detail

Understanding the effects of artifacts on automated polyp detection and incorporating that knowledge via learning without forgetting

Survival rates for colorectal cancer are higher when polyps are detected at an early stage and can be removed before they develop into malignant tumors. Automated polyp detection, which is dominated by deep learning based methods, seeks to improve early detection of polyps. However, current efforts rely heavily on the size and quality of the training datasets. The quality of these datasets often suffers from various image artifacts that affect the visibility and hence, the detection rate. In this work, we conducted a systematic analysis to gain a better understanding of how artifacts affect automated polyp detection. We look at how six different artifact classes, and their location in an image, affect the performance of a RetinaNet based polyp detection model. We found that, depending on the artifact class, they can either benefit or harm the polyp detector. For instance, bubbles are often misclassified as polyps, while specular reflections inside of a polyp region can improve detection capabilities. We then investigated different strategies, such as a learning without forgetting framework, to leverage artifact knowledge to improve automated polyp detection. Our results show that such models can mitigate some of the harmful effects of artifacts, but require more work to significantly improve polyp detection capabilities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.