Paper detail

Understanding the Dynamics of Information Flow During Disaster Response Using Absorbing Markov Chains

This paper aims to derive a quantitative model to evaluate the impact of information flow on the effectiveness of disaster response. At the core of the model is a specialized absorbing Markov chain that models the process of delivering federal assistance to the community while considering stakeholder interactions and information flow uncertainty. Using the proposed model, the probability of community satisfaction is computed to reflect the effectiveness of disaster response. A hypothetical example is provided to demonstrate the applicability and interpretability of the derived quantitative model. Practically, the research provides governmental stakeholders interpretable insights for evaluating the impact of information flow on their disaster response effectiveness so that critical stakeholders can be targeted proactive actions for enhanced disaster response.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.