Paper detail

Understanding Sparse JL for Feature Hashing

Feature hashing and other random projection schemes are commonly used to reduce the dimensionality of feature vectors. The goal is to efficiently project a high-dimensional feature vector living in $\mathbb{R}^n$ into a much lower-dimensional space $\mathbb{R}^m$, while approximately preserving Euclidean norm. These schemes can be constructed using sparse random projections, for example using a sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) transform. A line of work introduced by Weinberger et. al (ICML '09) analyzes the accuracy of sparse JL with sparsity 1 on feature vectors with small $\ell_\infty$-to-$\ell_2$ norm ratio. Recently, Freksen, Kamma, and Larsen (NeurIPS '18) closed this line of work by proving a tight tradeoff between $\ell_\infty$-to-$\ell_2$ norm ratio and accuracy for sparse JL with sparsity $1$. In this paper, we demonstrate the benefits of using sparsity $s$ greater than $1$ in sparse JL on feature vectors. Our main result is a tight tradeoff between $\ell_\infty$-to-$\ell_2$ norm ratio and accuracy for a general sparsity $s$, that significantly generalizes the result of Freksen et. al. Our result theoretically demonstrates that sparse JL with $s > 1$ can have significantly better norm-preservation properties on feature vectors than sparse JL with $s = 1$; we also empirically demonstrate this finding.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.