Paper detail

Understanding Global Loss Landscape of One-hidden-layer ReLU Networks, Part 2: Experiments and Analysis

The existence of local minima for one-hidden-layer ReLU networks has been investigated theoretically in [8]. Based on the theory, in this paper, we first analyze how big the probability of existing local minima is for 1D Gaussian data and how it varies in the whole weight space. We show that this probability is very low in most regions. We then design and implement a linear programming based approach to judge the existence of genuine local minima, and use it to predict whether bad local minima exist for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, and find that there are no bad differentiable local minima almost everywhere in weight space once some hidden neurons are activated by samples. These theoretical predictions are verified experimentally by showing that gradient descent is not trapped in the cells from which it starts. We also perform experiments to explore the count and size of differentiable cells in the weight space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.