Paper detail

Uncertainty evaluation and correlation analysis of single-particle energies in phenomenological nuclear mean field: An investigation of propagating uncertainties for independent model parameters

Based on Monte Carlo approach and conventional error analysis theory, taking the heaviest doubly magic nucleus $^{208}$Pb as an example, we firstly evaluate the propagated uncertainties of universal potential parameters for three typical types of single-particle energies in the phenomenological Woods-Saxon mean field. Accepting the Woods-Saxon modeling with uncorrelated model parameters, we find that the standard deviations of single-particle energies obtained by the Monte Carlo simulation and the error propagation rules are in good agreement with each other. It seems that the energy uncertaintis of the single-particle levels regularly evoluate with some quantum numbers to a large extent for the given parameter uncertainties. Further, the correlation properties of the single-particle levels within the domain of input parameter uncertainties are analyzed using the method of statistical analysis, e.g., with the aid of Pearson correlation coefficients. It is found that the positive, negative or unrelated relationship may appear between two selected single-particle levels, which will be very helpful for evaluating the theoretical uncertainty related to the single-particle levels (e.g., $K$ isomer) in nuclear structural calculations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.