Paper detail

Uncertainty-based Cross-Modal Retrieval with Probabilistic Representations

Probabilistic embeddings have proven useful for capturing polysemous word meanings, as well as ambiguity in image matching. In this paper, we study the advantages of probabilistic embeddings in a cross-modal setting (i.e., text and images), and propose a simple approach that replaces the standard vector point embeddings in extant image-text matching models with probabilistic distributions that are parametrically learned. Our guiding hypothesis is that the uncertainty encoded in the probabilistic embeddings captures the cross-modal ambiguity in the input instances, and that it is through capturing this uncertainty that the probabilistic models can perform better at downstream tasks, such as image-to-text or text-to-image retrieval. Through extensive experiments on standard and new benchmarks, we show a consistent advantage for probabilistic representations in cross-modal retrieval, and validate the ability of our embeddings to capture uncertainty.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.